http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar:8080/xmlui/handle/filodigital/6359 2026-04-12T21:18:29Z http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar:8080/xmlui/handle/filodigital/6463 Cambios en la historia y en la filosofía de la ciencia en Kuhn The purpose of this paper is to assess the role of the history of science in the philosophy of Thomas Kuhn. In order to understand his views. I examine the subjet with the help of a taxonomy proposed by Marx Wartofsky. I intend to demonstrate that the relations between both disciplines (history of science and philosophy of science) have changed along his writings since his famous book. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions until his last articles of the 80's and 90's. I will argue that the history of science has fully lost its protagonist role it had in the early stage of Kuhn's thought. My argument is that this fact is a consequence -among other reasons- of the evolution of the incommensurability thesis. 14 ref.; Fil: Lucero, Susana. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de FIlosofía y Letras; Argentina 1998-01-01T00:00:00Z http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar:8080/xmlui/handle/filodigital/6464 La filosofía británica en los siglos XVII y XVIII. Vigencia de su problemática. Buenos Aires: FUNDEC. Fundación para el desarrollo de los estudios cognitivos, 1995. 253 p. Reseñado por Susana Maidana; Fil: Maidana, Susana. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; Argentina 1998-01-01T00:00:00Z http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar:8080/xmlui/handle/filodigital/6465 Die verkehrte Welt des Jürgen Habermas, [El mundo invertido de Jürgen Habermas]. Hamburg: Junius, 1995 (Trad. de la ed. original en holandés, Amsterdam, 1992) Reseñado por Esteban Speyer; Fil: Speyer, Esteban. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina 1998-01-01T00:00:00Z http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar:8080/xmlui/handle/filodigital/6462 Individuo social y autonomía en Marx In this paper I Claim that we can find in Marx's social and political theory a radical ontological turn that separates him from the former perspectives of contractualism and Hegel. The Marxian nodal conception of the social individual involves a double relation of appropiation and critique respect those former perspectives. With contractualism, Marx affirms the notions of autonomy and equality, but against it, he denies an atomist and ahistorical approach. With Hegel, Marx's perspective involves a relationist, conflictivist and historicist approach, but against it, Marx criticizes teological organicism. By no means I say that this is the only thread in Marx's complex thought. This perspective coexist with other incompatible ones. But I think that not much attention has been given to the Marxian perspective of the social individual, and that its contemporary development could be of much help in explicative, normative and political contexts. 18 ref.; Fil: Gilabert, Pablo. Universidad Concordia de Montreal; Canadá 1998-01-01T00:00:00Z